In Solasta: Crown of the Magister, players face unique challenges as they explore a fantasy world filled with magic, ancient artifacts, and mysteries. 

One quest, in particular, puts players in a tricky situation where they must accuse someone of stealing valuable relics. 

Deciding who to accuse can affect the storyline and relationships with other characters. This guide will cover everything you need to know about the quest, the suspects, and how to make an informed choice in the game.

Solasta Who to Accuse: Who Are the Main Suspects in the Solasta Relic Theft?

Daliat Sunbird

Daliat Sunbird is a main suspect in the relic theft case. He acts strangely and is often seen near the Tower of Knowledge, where the theft occurred. 

Players who investigate further will notice that Daliat seems to avoid certain questions or gives vague answers. His behavior raises suspicion, making him a prime suspect for many players.

Why Daliat Might Be Guilty

• He has a questionable past with rumors about him.
• He often seems nervous when the relics are discussed.
• Some clues link him indirectly to the stolen artifacts, making his motives unclear but suspicious.

Why Daliat Might Be Innocent

• Despite his suspicious behavior, there’s no direct proof against him.
• He may act strangely due to stress or unrelated reasons.
• Accusing him without solid proof might lead to unintended consequences in the game.

Solasta Who to Accuse: Is Maddhilde Copperan a Suspect in the Relic Theft?

Maddhilde Copperan

Maddhilde Copperan is another suspect in the relic theft investigation. Though not immediately obvious, her position in the organization and her familiarity with the 

Tower of Knowledge make her a possible suspect. Players may find that she has strong opinions about certain relics and often tries to protect the organization’s secrets, which raises questions about her intentions.

Why Maddhilde Might Be Guilty

• She holds a position that grants her access to restricted areas.
• Her knowledge of the relics and artifacts suggests she could have a hidden agenda.
• Her reaction to the theft seems unusually defensive, which makes her look suspicious.

Why Maddhilde Might Be Innocent

• Her protective nature toward the organization may simply be out of loyalty.
• Players do not find strong evidence against her, only circumstantial clues.
• Accusing her might negatively impact relationships with other characters aligned with her.

Solasta Who to Accuse: Could Beryl Stonebeard Be Involved?

Beryl Stonebeard

Beryl Stonebeard is another character that players can consider in the relic theft case. She is known for her expertise in ancient artifacts, which puts her in a unique position regarding the stolen relics. 

While Beryl is respected for her skills and knowledge, players may wonder if she used her position to take the artifacts.

Why Beryl Might Be Guilty

• She has detailed knowledge of the artifacts, which could help her avoid detection.
• Her access to sensitive areas could give her the means to steal the relics.
• Her high status might make her think she could get away with it.

Why Beryl Might Be Innocent

• Beryl has an excellent reputation and has been loyal to the organization for years.
• No clear motive is presented in the game for her to steal the relics.
• Accusing her could harm players’ standing with factions that respect her work.

Solasta Who to Accuse: What Evidence Should You Gather Before Accusing?

Investigate All Possible Leads

The quest to find the true thief of the relics requires players to gather as much evidence as possible. 

Investigating every clue will allow players to make a more informed decision. Each suspect has unique behaviors and details that add complexity to the mystery. 

By thoroughly exploring dialogue options and interactions, players can get a clearer picture of who may be responsible.

Tips for Gathering Evidence

• Talk to all characters and listen carefully to their responses.
• Check the Tower of Knowledge and related areas for hidden clues.
• Analyze any items or objects that may relate to the stolen relics.

Important Clues to Look For

• Dialogue cues that reveal a character’s personality or motives.
• Small details in the environment that link to a suspect.
• Clues that might indicate guilt, like hesitation or defensive behavior.

Solasta Who to Accuse: What Are the Consequences of Accusing the Wrong Person?

Impact on Factions and Relationships

Accusing someone in Solasta: Crown of the Magister isn’t just about solving a mystery; it’s about managing relationships and alliances. 

Choosing the wrong person to accuse could harm relationships with key factions or characters. Each suspect has connections, and accusing someone unfairly can make other characters distrust you.

How Factions May React

• Some factions may be loyal to certain suspects, affecting how they view you.
• Accusing a high-ranking person like Beryl could strain relations with influential groups.
• The correct choice may strengthen ties with one faction while weakening ties with another.

Potential Changes to the Storyline

• The game may open new quests based on the accusation outcome.
• Certain characters may refuse to help you if you’ve damaged your relationship with them.
• Key items or information could be locked depending on your choice.

Solasta Who to Accuse: What are the Pros and Cons of Each Suspect?

Suspect	Pros of Accusing Them	Cons of Accusing Them
Daliat Sunbird	Suspicious behavior; indirect clues	No direct evidence; possible faction backlash
Maddhilde Copperan	Position grants access to sensitive areas	Loyal to organization; no clear motive
Beryl Stonebeard	Expert knowledge on artifacts	Highly respected; lack of strong evidence

Solasta Who to Accuse: Should You Accuse Based on Evidence or Instinct?

Relying on Evidence

Making accusations based on evidence is usually the safest choice in Solasta. Gathering enough proof to support your decision will reduce the risk of unintended consequences. 

It may be tempting to rely on instinct, but accusations grounded in solid evidence tend to result in better outcomes.

Benefits of Evidence-Based Choices

• Builds trust with allies who respect fairness.
• Increases chances of identifying the correct suspect.
• Reduces the risk of harm to your character’s reputation.

Risks of Instinct-Based Choices

• Instinct-based accusations might lead to negative responses.
• May limit future options if the wrong person is accused.
• Can affect your standing with different factions if they perceive you as unfair.

Solasta Who to Accuse: How Can You Best Approach the Accusation Quest?

Take a Balanced Approach

For a balanced approach, players should weigh all factors: the evidence gathered, each suspect’s behavior, and the consequences of accusing someone incorrectly. 

While each choice has potential risks, balancing evidence and relationships can help players reach the most favorable outcome.

Tips for a Balanced Approach

• Weigh evidence against each suspect evenly before deciding.
• Avoid jumping to conclusions based on a suspect’s appearance or initial behavior.
• Be mindful of faction alliances and think about long-term goals in the game.

Recommended Steps to Take

• Talk to every suspect and collect all possible clues.
• Review each piece of evidence thoroughly.
• Make a decision that aligns with your character’s story goals.

Conclusion: Accusing the Right Person in Solasta

Accusing the correct person in Solasta: Crown of the Magister can be a challenging task, with various suspects, each with motives and behaviors that suggest potential guilt. 

By gathering sufficient evidence, considering faction relationships, and analyzing the suspects carefully, players can make a choice that leads to the best outcome. 

With careful thought and strategic decision-making, you’ll be able to navigate the accusation quest successfully, strengthening your position in the game.

FAQs About “Who to Accuse in Solasta”

What happens if I accuse the wrong person in Solasta?

Accusing the wrong person can lead to negative consequences, like damaged relationships with factions or characters refusing to help you in future quests.

How do I gather evidence against suspects?

You can gather evidence by talking to characters, searching the Tower of Knowledge, and looking for clues related to the stolen relics.

Which suspect is the most suspicious in the relic theft quest?

Daliat Sunbird appears most suspicious due to his nervous behavior and indirect clues linking him to the theft.

Can I change my accusation later in the game?

No, once you accuse a character, the decision is final and affects future interactions.

How do factions react to my accusation choice?

Factions may change their relationship with you depending on who you accuse, especially if the suspect has close ties with a faction.

What’s the safest way to make an accusation in Solasta?

The safest way is to gather as much evidence as possible and base your accusation on solid proof rather than instinct alone.

Do I get any rewards for accusing the right person?

Yes, accusing the right person can lead to better rewards, faction support, and access to future quests.